Venue: This will be a virtual meeting, therefore, will not take place in a physical location. To view this event please click link below:
Contact: Lynn Harker Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Mr P Scott was nominated as Vice?Chair for this meeting only.
Roll Call for Members and Officers
It was noted that all the above members and officers were present at the meeting.
Apologies for Absence
To receive any apologies for absence.
Apologies for absence were received from Ms J Clayton, Dr M Hanley, Mrs R Hanson and Mr J Kane.
Membership of the Committee
To note any changes to the membership of the Committee.
There were no changes to the membership of the Committee on this occasion.
Disclosures of Interest
Members are invited to disclose any disclosable pecuniary interest they have in any item on the agenda which comprises
1. Details of any employment, office, trade, profession or vocation carried on for profit or gain.
2. Details of any payment or provision of any other financial benefit (other than from the authority) made or provided within the relevant period in respect of any expenses incurred by you in carrying out duties as a member, or towards your election expenses. (This includes any payment or financial benefit from a trade union within the meaning of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
3. Details of any contract which is made between you (or a body in which you have a beneficial interest) and the authority.
(a) Under which goods or services are to be provided or works are to be executed; and
(b) Which has not been fully discharged.
4. Details of any beneficial interest in land which is within the area of the authority.
5. Details of any licence (alone or jointly with others) to occupy land in the area of the authority for a month or longer.
6. Details of any tenancy where (to your knowledge).
(a) The landlord is the authority; and
(b) The tenant is a body in which you have a beneficial interest.
7. Details of any beneficial interest in securities of a body where
(a) That body (to your knowledge) has a place of business or land in the area of the authority; and
(b) Either –
(i) The total nominal value of the securities exceeds £25,000 or one hundredth of the total issued share capital of that body; or
(ii) If that share capital of that body is of more than one class, the total nominal value of the shares of any one class in which the relevant person has a beneficial interest exceeds one hundredth of the total issued share capital of that class.
A “disclosable pecuniary interest” is an interest of a councillor or their partner (which means spouse or civil partner, a person with whom they are living as husband or wife, or a person with whom they are living as if they are civil partners).
Mr C Whiteside declared a personal interest as his wife was employed at the West Cumberland Hospital.
Exclusion of Press and Public
To consider whether the press and public should be excluded from the meeting during consideration of any item on the agenda.
RESOLVED, that the press and public be not excluded from the meeting for any items of business.
To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 5 October 2020 (copy enclosed).
With reference to minute 65 – Urgent and Emergency Care and Elective Care Mr N Hughes requested clarification regarding the reference to ‘performance against the 6 week standard reaching 63.5% waiting over six weeks ……..’. It was agreed officers would look into this and report back at the next meeting.
RESOLVED, that taking into account the above, the minutes of the meeting held on 5 October 2020, with the exception of minute 65, be agreed as a correct record.
To consider a report by the Strategic Policy and Scrutiny Adviser (copy enclosed).
The Committee received a report which updated members on developments in health scrutiny, the Committee’s Work Programme and monitoring of actions not covered elsewhere on the Committee’s agenda.
A discussion took place regarding the Lead Health Scrutiny Member meeting for North Cumbria where a briefing had taken place on the development of the action plan responding to the North Cumbria Integrated Care Trust CQC report. It was noted that this would be considered at a meeting of Lead Members in January with further communication to the Cumbria Health Scrutiny Committee.
The Committee, whilst welcoming the greater use of open source systems which enabled records to be viewed appropriately by clinicians across different health and care settings, also raised concerns regarding the possibility of patient confidentiality being jeopardised. During the course of discussion members emphasised their disappointment at the slow progress being made regarding the digitising of records and improving system interoperability and agreed this should be considered at a future meeting of the Committee.
Members received an update on the successful implementation of the Hyper Acute Stroke Unit. Officers confirmed that the renewal programme being put in place for new CT diagnostic provision was not in addition to what was available at present.
The Committee was informed that with regards to North Tyneside Clinical Commissioning Group’s partnership with Livi to provide online GP services there were no similar plans in North Cumbria.
A discussion took place regarding the roll out of the national campaign on the new part of NHS 111 to make appointments at Accident and Emergency (A&E). Members were informed this new facility had reduced waiting times and made it a safer environment during the pandemic by reducing the number of people waiting. The Committee was informed that although the new system was effective assurances had been made that patients without appointments would not be turned away from A&E.
Members received a positive update on the engagement work regarding the plans being considered to bring Workington’s five GPs together to improve services to patients and highlighted the need to continue to consider this again in the future.
The Committee was informed that scoping work for the impact of COVID was being programmed and members were asked to contact the Strategic Policy and Scrutiny Advisor with any matters they wished to be included.
During the course of discussion the importance of lead member meetings was highlighted as a means to raise important issues but emphasised the continued need for transparency through the Cumbria Health Scrutiny Committee.
(1) the Lead Health Scrutiny Member meetings with System Leaders in North and South Cumbria be noted;
(2) the CQC report and action plan outlining the Trust’s response be circulated to the Committee when available for comment in advance of the next Lead Health Member meeting;
(3) the Work Programme be noted and an update on HiP2/rebuilding hospitals programme for South Cumbria and Lancashire be included.
To consider a report by the Chief Executive - Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust (copy to follow).
The Committee received an update on the challenges facing some of the mental health, learning disability and autism services within South Cumbria, to share Lancashire & South Cumbria Foundation Trust’s (LSCFT) improvement work to date and to have early discussions regarding a scoping and involvement exercise being launched regarding Mental Health inpatient provision in South Cumbria.
Members were informed that LSCFT had taken over the provision of mental health, learning disability and autism services in South Cumbria in October 2019 and since this date had continually improved service provision, whilst acknowledging that COVID-19 had added an additional dynamic.
The Committee noted a number of quality concerns which had been raised when the Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspected the previous Trust, Cumbria Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, in May 2019. It was explained that an Improvement Plan had been developed to address the issues raised, with significant actions taken across all services within South Cumbria to address quality challenges.
A discussion took place regarding the Lack of Freedom to Speak Up Guardian provision and awareness across the services and asked whether this was a safeguarding of whistleblowing provision. It was explained this was a national requirement to encourage people to speak up.
Members were informed there were remaining quality challenges in the inpatient services (staffing, culture and clinical practice issues), as post transfer of the services, due diligence and governance systems identified further actions. It was explained there were also challenges within the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAHMS), which were related to culture, leadership and ensuring high quality, responsive care. The Committee noted that the Trust had also commenced a review of CAHMS and had employed a CAMHS Improvement Lead who would commence their role in January 2021.
The Committee raised concerns regarding staffing culture and clinical practice issues. It was explained they had been inherited and highlighted that one of the biggest challenges was the recruitment of clinical staff which was improving. The Trust explained continual improvement was taking place and emphasised the need to support staff to ensure a caring, compassionate and high quality service was delivered.
Members were informed that the inpatient infrastructure was not of good quality and did not allow for the provision of modern mental health inpatient care. It was noted that the type of accommodation at the Kentmere inpatient unit on the Westmorland Hospital site in Kendal was being replaced nationally with a desire for more individual en-suite bedroom accommodation.
The Committee was informed that the COVID-19 pandemic had necessitated the immediate temporary closure of the Kentmere Unit to ensure the Trust was able to provide socially distanced inpatient care. It was highlighted that the Trust remained committed to reopening a mental health inpatient unit on the Westmorland Hospital site and had secured capital investment of £5m from the Department of Health to fully refurbish and redevelop what was previously first floor dormitory accommodation to ground level en-suite accommodation with garden access.
It was explained the Trust also provided inpatient care from ... view the full minutes text for item 77.
To consider a report by the Chief Operating Officer, North Cumbria Clinical Commissioning Group (copy enclosed).
Members considered a report from North Cumbria Clinical Commissioning Group which updated the Committee on community hospitals in the county.
The Committee was informed that Maryport Hospital had undergone a huge renovation project to upgrade the former inpatient unit to a state of the art day unit and now provided additional services including a thriving 3 bedded ambulatory care assessment bay where patients could receive observations and ECG monitoring which would be reviewed by the on?call doctor.
The Committee noted that building on the work at Maryport, there had also been the development of nurse-led day services which were also being delivered from a base at Wigton Hospital and currently running Monday to Friday. It was explained that both Maryport and Wigton Day Units had been absolutely crucial in enabling the community teams to deliver a swabbing service for the health and care system in north Cumbria. Members were informed there was also work underway involving the third sector to develop a community health and well-being hub at the Wigton Hospital site.
A discussion took place regarding the facility at Alston, highlighting how this, in the past, had been referred to as a good example by the Kings Fund and how a difficult and challenging position had turned positive. Members, therefore, expressed their disappointment at the lack of progress and commitments made at the time and that those challenges existed prior to COVID. A particular area of concern highlighted was the estates; it was confirmed that officers were not aware of any financial issue which would restrict the estate work going ahead but would look into this matter and keep members updated. Officers raised concerns regarding the comments made by the Committee and agreed to investigate the matter further with ICC colleagues and report back to members.
Members were informed that work to progress the digital hub was underway but had been delayed due to COVID and staffing issues. Officers agreed to provide an update on progress in developing and delivering the digital hub in Alston and a reflection on how the community were being engaged on the future plans.
The Committee received an update on Keswick noting that following completion of works in Autumn 2019, which had included a substantial contribution from the League of Friends, the new four bedded ward had increased the number of beds in the unit from 12 to 16. It was explained the vision for the Hospital remained the same and included support reablement and recuperation.
Members were informed that Brampton hospital had opened in July 2020 following a £1m refurbishment programme and welcomed the contribution of around £250,000 from the Brampton Hospital League of Friends. It was explained there were now significantly improved facilities offering better privacy and dignity standards for patients with spacious en-suite rooms. The Committee welcomed the recruitment of four new registered nurses and a healthcare assistant on the reopening of the hospital and noted there was no major change for the vision of the hospital which ... view the full minutes text for item 78.
Hospital Acquired Infections
To consider a report by the University Hospital Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust (copy enclosed).
The Committee considered a report from University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust regarding the Infection Prevention and Control Board Assurance Framework.
Members were informed that as an understanding of COVID-19 had developed, Public Health England and related guidanceon required infection prevention and control measures had been published, updated and refined to reflect the learning. It was explained this continuous process would ensure organisations could respond in an evidence?based way to maintain the safety of patients, service users and staff.
The Committee was informed the Framework had been developed to help providers assess themselves against the guidance as a source of internal assurance that quality standards were being maintained as well as identifying any areas of risk and demonstrating corrective actions had been undertaken. It was explained the tool, therefore, could also provide assurance to trust boards that organisational compliance had been systematically reviewed.
Members were informed that the Framework was intended to be useful for directors of infection prevention and control, medical directors and directors of nursing rather than imposing an additional burden. Officers explained this was a decision which would be taken locally whilst highlighting that organisations must ensure they had alternative appropriate internal assurance mechanisms in place.
It was emphasised to members that the robust risk assessment processes were central to protecting the health, safety and welfare of patients, service users and staff. It was explained that where it was not possible to eliminate risk, organisations had to assess and mitigate risk and provide safe systems of work. Members noted that in the context of COVID-19, there was an inherent level of risk for NHS staff who were treating and caring for patients and service users and for the patients and service users themselves in a healthcare setting; all organisations must, therefore, ensure that risks were identified, managed and mitigated effectively.
The Committee were informed of three areas of the action plan which the Trust were struggling to comply with:-
Ø The provision of cleaning four times daily in areas where there were no persistent outbreak plans. It was explained that this was due to a gap in domestic service provision to support the additional cleaning requirements, which at present was being provided by local companies together with nursing and clinical support. Members were informed this required funding approval and that a business case for additional resources had been developed and was awaiting approval.
Ø Patients were required to have two negative tests prior to discharge which had caused high occupancy rates.
Ø Currently the Trust were compliant with bed spacing but additional infection control screens also needed to be installed.
Members were informed social distancing in the Intensive Care Unit at Furness General Hospital had been a challenge, therefore, this had been moved to a larger area and included additional beds.
The Committee acknowledged that hygiene was a pre?requisite and welcomed the national campaign to encourage domestic staff into the Service, highlighting their invaluable contributions during the pandemic, and expressed their ... view the full minutes text for item 79a
To consider a report by the North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust (copy to follow).
The Committee received a report from North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust on Infection Prevention and Control. Members were informed that work had been undertaken across the Trust in order to implement and embed a process to audit current compliance, identify actions and provide assurance with any gaps in the Board Assurance Framework (BAF) being actively monitored throughout an improvement plan.
Members received details on COVID 19 outbreaks noting that the Trust currently had one inpatient ward in active outbreak management at the Cumberland Infirmary site.
Officers explained that a significant amount of work was being undertaken as part of the Trust’s Winter Plan for additional capacity as well as improvements being made to the estate, particularly at the Cumberland Infirmary site.
A discussion took place regarding the challenges encountered due to the lack of space available on the estate. It was explained that the space between patients was just over two metres but the space around them should be twice the size that it was, therefore, beds had been reduced in bays from five to three to allow for this but highlighted it was not possible to implement this throughout the Trust. The Trust had identified that a significant build was required to make the Cumberland Infirmary site fit for purpose but the funding required was greater than the Trust could provide.
The Trust felt that the main ongoing risk was further episodes of COVID 19 infection both in the local population and within the hospital; the strategy to mitigate this risk was close co?operation with community colleagues to help identify and reduce the impact of any community clusters through regular communications.
Members noted that in addition to COVID 19 there was an increase of Clostridium difficile cases and hospital onset Gram-negative infection, therefore, the Trust was relaunching its key prevention strategies, including the importance of hydration, cleanliness of the environment and antimicrobial stewardship efforts.
The Committee discussed the challenges regarding domestic team resources. Officers acknowledged there were staffing issues, particularly at the Carlisle site, due to the provision being via the PFI contract; but also highlighted shortages due to staff?related COVID outbreaks. Both members and officers acknowledged this low paid invaluable resource.
Members raised their concerns regarding the challenges which staff faced working in a threatening environment during the pandemic and asked how well this had been managed, taking into account social distancing measures etc. It was acknowledged that lack of social distancing during break times had contributed to COVID outbreaks amongst staff but the Trust were continuously reinforcing the need for social distancing.
The Chair thanked the Officer for his report.
To consider a report by the University Hospital Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust (copy enclosed).
The Committee considered a report which gave an update on Morecambe Bay Clinical Commissioning Group’s engagement process regarding the proposal to implement consistent referral and treatment criteria for the podiatry service provided by University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay Trust.
Members had previously been informed that in order to create sufficient capacity in the South Cumbria NHS Podiatric Service to manage national clinical priorities, expectations for diabetic foot care and the growing demand for more complex interventions within existing resources, the CCG and UHMBT had been exploring which elements of the current service could be delivered outside the NHS for people of South Cumbria. It was explained it had been felt that ceasing the provision of the low level skin and nail element of the service, ensuring this was in line with the North Lancashire service offer, would permit reinvestment in the treatment of people with a higher medical or podiatric need. It was highlighted that such an approach had been effectively implemented in other parts of the country and that this arrangement was also extant in the former North Lancashire CCG for patients of Lancaster and would provide equity of service provision for the population of MBCCG.
The Committee welcomed the consultations which had taken place in North Cumbria Integrated Care Trust on the implementation of the new service specification. Members noted that as a result proposed pathway had been developed for vulnerable patients who had been treated and discharged if they no longer met the criteria together with advice on processes for training staff to enable them to have relevant conversations with patients who were discharged as a result of the new service criteria as well as offering enhanced patient education.
The Committee noted that in line with the NHS guidance; COVID-19 Prioritisation within Community Services, Podiatry face to face services were stood down with the exception of high-risk diabetic foot ulcer management. The service re-opened in August 2020 for face to face appointments with a plan to increase activity. It was explained that to date the Team were operating at 60% of previous capacity for face to face appointments due to the social distancing measures in place for infection prevention.
Members were informed that currently each new referral was being triaged by the Team to assess the podiatric need and only high-risk patients were being offered a face to face appointment due to the capacity restrictions. It was noted that those high-risk patients, often with complex conditions, were now offered longer appointments to enable the clinician to fully assess their condition which it was felt had significantly improved outcomes for this group of patients.
The Committee noted that in light of the rationale Morecambe Bay Clinical Commissioning Group proposed to implement the new service specification with effect from 4 January 2021. It was envisaged that the implementation would take approximately 6-9 months and was intended to be carried out in three stages.
Members were informed that in all cases the Podiatrist would notify the GP and/or ... view the full minutes text for item 80.
Date of Future Meeting
To note that the next meeting of the Committee will be held virtually on Tuesday 23 February 2021 at 10.30 am.
It was noted that the next meeting of the Committee would be held on virtually on Tuesday 23 February 2021 at 10.30 am.